Welcome to Biting-Edge, a blog shared by authors and vampire experts, Mario Acevedo and Jeanne Stein. We’ll cover urban fantasy, vampires, pop culture, and all things Joss Whedon. Unlike other fantasy blogs, we don’t insist on body cavity searches (unless you ask politely). Snarkiness is most welcome...though we won't promise not to bite back!

Sunday, March 24, 2013
  Nothing succeeds like success

Mario here:


What I'm reading this week: In The Woods by Tana French.










Getting published is an emotional boxing match, you versus Goliath. Unless you got an enchanted sling and rock in your backpack, expect a long, bruising battle. You pour yourself into your work, and it's so easy for an agent to say no. Once upon a time, they had to take minutes to scrawl a negative missive on your letter and stuff it into an SASE. Now with the magic of the Internet, rejection takes seconds. David Cameron performed an experiment to demonstrate how myopic the process can be. He copied a short story published in The New Yorker, thinking here is a work that had been vetted by the top pooch in the dog pile of American short fiction, and so it must easily pass any literary smell test. But no. Every magazine he submitted the story to, rejected it. Including The New Yorker. What did Cameron prove? That the system was unfair? Waa, waa! Like that's a surprise.


For the past couple of weeks, millions of computer bytes have been chewed up regarding Hugh Howey, the success of his novel Wool, and what that means in the publishing world. Many have hyper-ventilated in their claims that Howey's experience with Kindle was a game changer for writers. Namely that us hacks no longer needed the blessing of the New York Six to make money from our work. We can all get rich self-publishing our ebooks. After all, Howey turned down seven-figure advances. But not so fast. What Howey proved was to demonstrate that old truism: If people can make money from you, they will come knocking. And, like Howey, you can turn down their deals if you got plenty of fuck you money in your pocket. Howey hadn't done anything that others haven't tried. Some with better success than others. (A few friends have managed to quit their day jobs; others have yet to sell more than a half-dozen copies.) Howey happened to have the alignment of the stars, some luck, and a damn good story well told. Have self-pubbed ebooks changed the market? Only by 25%. That means 75% of book sales are still in traditional paper form.

Though we've pimped them before, to keep the pump primed of some deserving writers recently venturing into the self-pubbed ebook swamp, including our own Jeanne, please patronize these offerings. If you already have copies, then please post a review and hustle the books to your friends.











Labels: , , , , , , ,

 
Comments:
On the Cameron piece, I've heard this done before. I see what the point of his "logical argument" is, but however tongue-in-cheek the "scientific reproduction," I've heard this done before, and the result is always the same. If the object of these experiments weren't something so heavily and thoroughly weighted on the "subjective" or "variable" side of the equation, I could see a different outcome, but writing being what it is (i.e., so MANY variables...), I'll never expect to see a different outcome, short of a statistical probability. Fact is, was not Cameron's main thrust more of an emotional investigation? To emotionally satisfy not just us, but himself into thinking there was some "objective reality" to this whole publishing business, when, in reality, there really is not? It's all subjective. Just for example--purely for argument--when I first wrote my early stories, I thought them great. If not the idea, the writing. But, years later, going back over these unsold beauties, I did find that some did, truly, stink, for one reason or the other. That's not to say that the New Yorker piece stinks, but that "liking" or "accepting" something is highly relative, highly subjective, highly VARIABLE, for any reason. Tastes change, attitudes and states-of-mind change. And who's to say that using the original title would have worked? Did his fictitiously created author ID, etc., have the same gravitas? The the accepting and rejecting editors have the same brand of breakfast cereal and coffee that morning? Get a kiss on the cheek from their significant others on the way to work? Receive a smile from a stranger on the was into the building? Have the same beat of butterfly wings on the other side of the globe? There are just so many variables! And did those editors even read past the first line of the query letter, true! While amusing and continuing to "expose" what we all know about the publishing world, these sorts of "experiments" are, IMHO, exercises in futility (or "The Wreck of the Titan")....
 
Frank: I must've touched a nerve. Thanks for the enthusiastic response.
 
Being a writer isn't for the faint of heart, that's for sure. Keep Calm and Write On....
 
Man, I get this alot---people think I'm "spun up," or somethin...no, didn't mean to sound so serious! :-] In the words of a [dare I say?] well-loved blogger...I'm "just sayin"....

This is my HAPPY face---really! :-]]]

 
At my day job, I noticed a huge shift in attitude towards my novel once I had published paperback copies in my hands. Their mindset shifted to "Oh, you really DO have a book out!" The general public is still biased toward published paper books as being "vetted" for quality, even though there are tons of excellent self-published e-books and loads of sub-par printed books (Snooki hardcovers, anyone?). The bias isn't always fair, but neither is life.
 
Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link



<< Home
www.marioacevedo.com
jeanniestein.com

Biting Edge - Blogged


Marta Acosta
Vampiress.ca
Zombie Defense Tactics
L.A. Banks
Robin Brande
Douglas Clegg
Mary Janice Davidson
Midnight Moon Cafe
P.N. Elrod
Christine Feehan
Andrew Fox
Jasper Fforde
Neil Gaiman
Laurell K. Hamilton
Charlaine Harris
Charlie Huston
Sherrilyn Kenyon
The Midnight Hour
First Offenders
Christopher Moore
Susan Squires
Storytellers Unplugged
Carrie Vaughn
Lynn Viehl
Chelsea Quinn Yarbro


Agent Query
AOL Bookmaven
Bookmouth
Bookseller Chick
Bronze Word
GalleyCat
Guide to Literary Agents
Grumpy Old Bookman
Marcela Landres
Miss Snark
The Neglected Books Page
Preditors and Editors
Pub Rants
Publishers Lunch
Slushpile
Latino Stories


Alt Vampires
Love Vampires Reviews
Bite Me Magazine
Borderlands Bookstore
Dark Carnival Bookstore
Dark Hunter
Horror Writers Assoc.
Kaleighbug Books
Locus Magazine
Mysterious Galaxy Bookstore
Paranormal Fiction
Paranormality Universe
Realm of the Vampires
Science Fiction & Fantasy Writers Net
Undead Update
Vampire Genre
Vampire HQ
The Vampire Library
Vampires Vault
Vampress
Vamprowler
Vampyres Online



ARCHIVES
March 2006 / April 2006 / May 2006 / June 2006 / July 2006 / August 2006 / September 2006 / October 2006 / November 2006 / December 2006 / January 2007 / February 2007 / March 2007 / April 2007 / May 2007 / June 2007 / July 2007 / August 2007 / September 2007 / October 2007 / November 2007 / December 2007 / January 2008 / February 2008 / March 2008 / April 2008 / May 2008 / June 2008 / July 2008 / August 2008 / September 2008 / October 2008 / November 2008 / December 2008 / January 2009 / February 2009 / March 2009 / April 2009 / May 2009 / June 2009 / July 2009 / August 2009 / September 2009 / October 2009 / November 2009 / December 2009 / January 2010 / February 2010 / March 2010 / April 2010 / May 2010 / June 2010 / July 2010 / August 2010 / September 2010 / October 2010 / November 2010 / December 2010 / January 2011 / February 2011 / March 2011 / April 2011 / May 2011 / June 2011 / July 2011 / August 2011 / September 2011 / October 2011 / November 2011 / December 2011 / January 2012 / February 2012 / March 2012 / April 2012 / May 2012 / June 2012 / July 2012 / August 2012 / September 2012 / October 2012 / November 2012 / December 2012 / January 2013 / February 2013 / March 2013 / April 2013 / May 2013 / June 2013 / July 2013 /


Powered by Blogger