Welcome to Biting-Edge, a blog shared by authors and vampire experts, Mario Acevedo and Jeanne Stein. We’ll cover urban fantasy, vampires, pop culture, and all things Joss Whedon. Unlike other fantasy blogs, we don’t insist on body cavity searches (unless you ask politely). Snarkiness is most welcome...though we won't promise not to bite back!

Sunday, November 18, 2012
  You gotta just sparkle
Mario here:

What I'm reading: Women by Charles Bukowski











Love the series. Hate the series.  Regardless, you can't deny the power.

I'm talking the Twilight franchise.

I know Stephenie Meyer has her detractors, among them Stephen King who publicly skewered her. However, I can't help but taste sour grapes in his famous missive. The goal of every fiction writer is to connect with their audience. Basically, King panned Meyer for delivering to her audience what they wanted craved to read. Sure, most of us get nauseated at the idea of vegetarian sparkly vampires, especially those undead centenarians who skulk around high schools in search of romance. (Maybe in another universe, Jerry Sandusky could've been the love interest in a Meyer novel.) But Meyer nailed her audience--young female romance readers--who frankly didn't give a damn about wussy pedafiliac non-bloodsuckers. Meyer had so connected with her audience that in 2008, she represented 18% of $ales in the American publishing industry and kept her publisher from going under. Aside from Harry Potter, no other YA series has come close to that success. Not The Hunger Games (as good as it was), or Percy Jackson and the Olympians (another excellent series) or the much touted The Night Circus (positioned to be the Next Big Thing). So go out there and connect with your fans and rake in the bucks.

You love zombies? You wanna earn karma points? I mean buckets of karma points. So much karma you could steal from your mother and still get VIP seating in Heaven? 

Then check out this KickStarter project from ace cinematographer, Alexandre Phillippe. The man who gave us documentaries such as The People Vs. George Lucas and now asks the driving question: Why do we love zombies? in his new project Doc of the Dead.


Labels: , , ,

 
Comments:
Not just young female romance readers--Meyers has as many adult fans as she does YA. Like it or not, she pushed a right button...much the same way E.L.James has. I only hope I can find a button like that someday!!

Jeanne
 
Mario, excellent, succinct, post.

I hope I never get to "a place" where I do as King did. I never begrudge any writer their success--however and whatever they "nailed" it and are able to eeeek out an existence doing what they really want to be doing. That said, it doesn't mean I have to love and adore their work! But, I don't HAVE to--apparently millions of others are already doing so (and I'm not naming names). It also "nailed it" for me in that it really (except maybe for literary fiction) ever REALLY matters if one's writing is actually good, by any standard. Plenty of examples also not going to cite. This doesn't mean readers are "dumb" or "brainless," it just means they LIKE WHAT THEY LIKE. I think it's the publishers and the writers who place so much importance/emphasis on how well-written something "has to be." And that's how is should be: you're good at something, you always wanna "up" your game. But that doesn't mean success hinges upon how well-done your writing is. It "merely" hinges upon how well your story "hits a sweet" spot among the masses, whatever the sweet spot is.
 
Well said! And I have to apologize--it's Meyer not Meyers.

Jeanne
 
Frank: Hitting the sweet spot is always good. It's finding the damn thing what's tough. I've started plenty of books with "pretty" writing but if the story doesn't hold me, I stop.
Jeanne: You push my buttons. And not the good ones!
 
I don't begrudge SM her success. Good for her that she's raked in a few truckloads of $$. Nor do I know her, so I can't say anything on a personal level. That won't stop me from expressing my less than salivating opionion of Twilight. It's not simply that she lacks a compelling style (it's not like she's alone in that), it's the essential weakness of Bella that I find so offensive. She's an incredibly weak protagonists, completely dependent upon a male to save her. She is never a purposeful instigator of action. I would say that she is at best a 50s stereotype, but that would insult a number of females protags from the 50s I can think of. Crticizing somebody's work doesn't have to be the same thing as bashing them.
 
Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link



<< Home
www.marioacevedo.com
jeanniestein.com

Biting Edge - Blogged


Marta Acosta
Vampiress.ca
Zombie Defense Tactics
L.A. Banks
Robin Brande
Douglas Clegg
Mary Janice Davidson
Midnight Moon Cafe
P.N. Elrod
Christine Feehan
Andrew Fox
Jasper Fforde
Neil Gaiman
Laurell K. Hamilton
Charlaine Harris
Charlie Huston
Sherrilyn Kenyon
The Midnight Hour
First Offenders
Christopher Moore
Susan Squires
Storytellers Unplugged
Carrie Vaughn
Lynn Viehl
Chelsea Quinn Yarbro


Agent Query
AOL Bookmaven
Bookmouth
Bookseller Chick
Bronze Word
GalleyCat
Guide to Literary Agents
Grumpy Old Bookman
Marcela Landres
Miss Snark
The Neglected Books Page
Preditors and Editors
Pub Rants
Publishers Lunch
Slushpile
Latino Stories


Alt Vampires
Love Vampires Reviews
Bite Me Magazine
Borderlands Bookstore
Dark Carnival Bookstore
Dark Hunter
Horror Writers Assoc.
Kaleighbug Books
Locus Magazine
Mysterious Galaxy Bookstore
Paranormal Fiction
Paranormality Universe
Realm of the Vampires
Science Fiction & Fantasy Writers Net
Undead Update
Vampire Genre
Vampire HQ
The Vampire Library
Vampires Vault
Vampress
Vamprowler
Vampyres Online



ARCHIVES
March 2006 / April 2006 / May 2006 / June 2006 / July 2006 / August 2006 / September 2006 / October 2006 / November 2006 / December 2006 / January 2007 / February 2007 / March 2007 / April 2007 / May 2007 / June 2007 / July 2007 / August 2007 / September 2007 / October 2007 / November 2007 / December 2007 / January 2008 / February 2008 / March 2008 / April 2008 / May 2008 / June 2008 / July 2008 / August 2008 / September 2008 / October 2008 / November 2008 / December 2008 / January 2009 / February 2009 / March 2009 / April 2009 / May 2009 / June 2009 / July 2009 / August 2009 / September 2009 / October 2009 / November 2009 / December 2009 / January 2010 / February 2010 / March 2010 / April 2010 / May 2010 / June 2010 / July 2010 / August 2010 / September 2010 / October 2010 / November 2010 / December 2010 / January 2011 / February 2011 / March 2011 / April 2011 / May 2011 / June 2011 / July 2011 / August 2011 / September 2011 / October 2011 / November 2011 / December 2011 / January 2012 / February 2012 / March 2012 / April 2012 / May 2012 / June 2012 / July 2012 / August 2012 / September 2012 / October 2012 / November 2012 / December 2012 / January 2013 / February 2013 / March 2013 / April 2013 / May 2013 / June 2013 / July 2013 /


Powered by Blogger